You mentioned Canada's 5% versus the United States' 50% for research and dual use.
Can you speak to how broadly they've cast the net on that definition and maybe to how broadly we should cast that definition here?
I will note things like the Superfund sites for environmental contamination—naval bases, air force bases, and research on cancer, because it was a major outcome for military personnel. The United States has cast that net very wide in the definition of dual-use research.
What should we be doing in Canada as we embark on this early journey that we're starting around BOREALIS and others?
