It depends on which program.
Certainly, if we think about the F-35, it is arguably the number one reason why we're at this state today. As my previous comments alluded to, the current pause or reassessment is completely politically based. I think, given we've already bought 16 aircraft, and we are in the process of training for this aircraft, to divert from this path at this stage.... Also, given the fact the air force has built much of its modernization of its data processing, its networking capabilities, it's pure folly in some ways to divert at this stage, and this is arguably for political reasons.
For other programs, it's less so, I think, but there are greater challenges with how we have set up the bureaucracy to avoid any sort of assumption of risk by the government, which basically adds more layers of processes and whatnot that are delaying systems. In some ways, you could argue there too that there's some politicization of this just to avoid any negative consequences.
