I'm chuckling a little bit, because remember, we first had an observation of what countries do when they get so fixated on just the percentage when Japan moved a whole bunch of their defence act acquisitions outside of it so they remained under 1%.
The addition of the Coast Guard was necessary. I think the security requirements of what they have to do within DND, rather than continuing to operate under DFO, are completely necessary and required. But we get into the issue of did we do it because of the strategic purposes we need to do, or did we do it simply for the political theatre of saying that we're going to get close to the 2%?
Having put them into the DND, we now have to figure out how we integrate what the Coast Guard is going to be able to offer, particularly in terms of as a platform and as a surveillance, and that is going to require some very significant expenditures and a different way of training. This is something, again, that follows through. It goes to a point Jessica was making that it's fine to have the infrastructure, but you also have to have the follow through to actually utilize it. That is what's going to be happening with the Coast Guard if we're doing what we say we're going to do, as opposed to simply having it as a means of meeting that 2%.