I think there are a couple of ways to look at that. One would be from the military side. As Dr. Rivard Piché and I mentioned in opening statements, it's to accelerate those aspects of NORAD modernization that are possible to accelerate. I don't think we should, as we approach NORAD modernization, stick to business as usual. This is a time to demonstrate that we're very serious about addressing the threats, and that we look for new and effective ways to bring projects forward. Things shouldn't be taking the kinds of timelines that were described earlier.
Secondly, I think there is a policy aspect to this that needs to be addressed. There are parts of our policy apparatus that slow down the ability to respond. The hybrid threats today operate in the seams between what's military and what's security. We have to find better ways to address those. The way that NORAD has to operate, splitting its response to certain types of threats between the way they're addressed in Canada and the way they're addressed in the U.S., creates friction and a seam that can be exploited. I think, if we were to reduce those policy differences, that would be another way to accelerate it.