But nothing prior to 1993. That would be correct to state.
I look at your recommendations here. They're pretty basic, pretty simple: provide sustained leadership, integrate energy and climate change. There was a government that was in power that was supposedly committed to this for that length of time, and for a decade there was absolutely no leadership. That seems to be the absolute raw minimum of government.
Do you not agree that leadership is one of the minimum requirements of any bureaucracy when dealing with this program?