I can see that. I guess it's us who are exhausted.
We have run out of time, and we do appreciate your being here. The balance of the discussion, very quickly, is how we deal with your presentation here today. So I'm going to thank you and your colleagues on behalf of the committee, and I'm going to now take it back into the committee.
Members of the committee, it seems to me, if I may, that there are a few obvious questions that are raised out of Ms. GĂ©linas's comments. I've just noted a couple of them. One was that question raised with respect to the response that was received from the Department of Finance on a petition. This is a citizen's petition. The commissioner is indicating concern about subsidies to the oil and gas industry, that she's not satisfied with the response. This is an example to me of what, in terms of closing the accountability loop, we really should act on. She's recommending that the committee may wish to get Finance Canada to clearly explain the extent to which the sector is subsidized.
The other thing is that two questions were raised, and I think members have raised them. One was about what progress has been made in developing a system of collecting and reporting information on expenditures and results. Also, there was one about the review of climate change programs led by Treasury Board and how was it being shared horizontally across departments.
I wonder if I could suggest this, if I may. My suggestion would be that we have our research meet informally with the vice-chairs and the chair next week, and if members wish to attend that, fine, but I'm going to, on behalf of the committee, ask research if they would go over Madam Commissioner's report and pick out those things that we could then look at for follow-up, and then ask the committee if they wish to do that.
So I've given three examples to follow up, but it would be up to the committee. Is there any discussion on that?
Mr. Cullen.