Mr. Chair, I was just consulting with Ms. Bell with respect to extending the time. It's 5:30. I would move—and she is in agreement—that we extend until 6 o'clock.
Because we have what is now an amended motion, the clarification that I would need is that the points of order are on the next motion. I would suggest that if the points of order that have been dealt with are the same as those we dealt with in the amended motion, the amendment has been passed.
Why don't we just concentrate on the motion as amended and go until 6 o'clock? Hopefully, we might even be able to get to and deal with those issues that you have with the second motion, but let's not prejudice that discussion. Why don't we extend until 6 o'clock and see if we can deal with at least the one motion? That would be my suggestion.