I'd be delighted to do that. I will qualify my answer, though, by saying that this is my personal belief. I'd be glad to get hard figures for you.
On the question of carbon capture and sequestration, we may have a slight difference in the way we view the world, but I view this as a fundamentally economic issue. There are now commercially viable carbon capture and storage opportunities. They're economically viable, because putting the carbon dioxide underground increases recovery of oil from the wells, and this more than pays for the extra costs.
I think your question was aimed more at a larger scale of capture and storage. This would become economical if, through regulation or other means, emitting carbon dioxide were to become costly enough to overcome the costs of capturing and storing. When that will happen, I don't know. It depends to some extent on how quickly we're able to reach the long-term goals enunciated in the clean air package announced today.