The reality is that EnerGuide for houses is owned, operated, and administered by NRCan, and the two are companion programs. In the House of Commons when questions have been put to the government about EnerGuide, the Minister of Natural Resources has responded to them. However, it may well be true that the administration and operation of the EnerGuide for low-income houses program is in another department. If that is the case, I'd be happy to say, on a technicality, “and renew the EnerGuide for Houses Program”, and delete “EnerGuide for Low Income Houses Programs”. I think the motion loses something by doing that, because they're companion programs. One happens to be administered by another department.
On October 19th, 2006. See this statement in context.