We're now speaking to the amendment, Mr. Harris. The portion you identified has been removed. At least that was my understanding. Did you not say that the low-income housing part was in another department? If this was the case, then clearly it would be beyond the scope of the mandate of this committee, and it would be out of order. Mr. Cullen has proposed an amendment, which we are now debating. It is to renew the EnerGuide for houses program. If that's not the case, perhaps you could clarify.
I'm sorry, the motion that is before the committee is the amendment itself. The amendment is simply that “EnerGuide for Low-Income Houses” be deleted from the previous motion, and that we change “these programs” to “this program”. That is what is under debate right now, whether we accept this amendment.