I understand where you're going—you're seeking clarity. We're not going to debate the motion until we have dealt with the amendment. The only reason I would reread the amended motion is for clarity. We're not dealing with that. We're simply dealing with the deleted part. So to put it backwards, I will read how it will appear after the amendment, if the amendment is accepted. It will say:
That the committee regrets that the government rejected the advice of departmental officials to continue and renew the EnerGuide for Houses program; that the committee calls upon the Minister of Natural Resources immediately to reinstate this program; and that this motion be reported to the House.
The motion before the House is an amendment to say we will delete “and EnerGuide for Low-Income Houses programs”, and change “these” to “this” and “programs” to “program”. That is the amendment.
Madame DeBellefeuille.