We tend to be very competitive at the entry level. We are able to recruit some very talented and competent young staff. With the staff at the more senior levels that we've lost in the recent past, most of the exodus that I mentioned would have been at the experienced and senior level. We are not able to attract experienced staff. We're just not in the game as far as the ability to match.... Quite honestly, we don't seek to match the salaries. The NEB is a very positive work environment. We're not seeking to achieve parity with industry--I think that's unrealistic--but to at least stay in the ball game in terms of being on the playing field, and then hopefully allowing the very concerted effort of the leadership and so on to keep the working conditions positive and to approach it from another number of ways to reward staff and offer training. It's fascinating and incredibly rewarding to work on behalf of all Canadians on issues such as this. We need the means, hopefully, to stay in the game in terms of attracting the calibre of people who are necessary to deal with these very complex issues.
As you saw in that first slide, it's everything from engineering to economics to the environment. As a truly integrated decision-maker on behalf of all Canadians, we really cover the broad spectrum of skills that are required to be able to do that.