As I understand the goal—and again, this is an area in which we're supporting the good work of folks like Pembina, the World Wildlife Fund, and others who have thought this through at a much more technical level—we're relying on the analysis that they have done at that technical level to suggest that it is possible. It's not going to be any one thing. It's going to be energy efficiencies on-site. It's going to be fuel-switching measures to lower carbon fuels. It's going to be a combination of capture and storage technologies, which are a long way from being perfect.
A lot of work needs to be done to understand how this work is going to go forward. As some of you have probably been following in the news, the carbon dioxide pipeline discussions are getting a little more public airing these days. Things like that will certainly be part of a solution, but so will offsets. It's that combination of things, with a solid commitment to be neutral by 2020, that we think is possible.
Again, I'm relying on a level of expert analysis that goes well beyond my personal level of expertise, but our confidence in working with these partners is that they're well grounded. It's ambitious, but it's absolutely necessary.
So I'm sorry if I misspoke, but I think it is possible. Both from an economic and technologically feasible perspective, it will be possible to achieve that. People just need to make that commitment and work toward it.