I think the scale and the diversity and complexity of the challenge of rebuilding a forest after a level of development of this size is something that certainly calls for a degree of humility. I think you would agree that when we start reclamation, typically they are almost conceptual plans, because it's a learning as you go. Certainly there's a lot about the boreal forest soils and hydrology that we simply don't know now, and that we will learn in the process of the reclamation. As much as we can project, we need to very much factor in the fact that we simply don't know a lot about what will work and what won't work, and we will be surprised by both what will work and what won't work. I would say that we have to be very humble in how we go about this and use a precautionary approach, because of the people on the land, because of the scale of the land that's going to be affected.
In some cases, a concern may simply be that what Syncrude may do well, their next-door neighbour may not do well. And all the good work that they do may be undermined because of a lack of consistency across that application.
This is why we're calling, and supporting the call, for a bit of a higher-level assessment of the key issues, the data that's required to inform decision-making. And frankly, I think that there's a lot of opportunity to gain efficiencies and assessments by doing that. I've talked to some of the companies that are saying that they're replicating material for environmental assessments that isn't necessary, and they could be looking at these issues much more strategically in a much more integrated way. I think there's an opportunity at this point in time to seriously look at cumulative effects at a higher level, at a strategic level, and use some of the research that we could do there to make each of the projects better.