I'm not advocating any particular process here. I'm citing that as something that, given the processes we have and can manage today, if we want to make a difference with them, we have to start sequestering the carbon dioxide. If that costs more—and it will cost more—but if it costs significantly more, smart minds will start figuring out different ways to do those processes. That's where the investment in research and development and science technology is absolutely vital. You make those investments, often targeting a particular expectation, but usually it's the surprises that you learn along the way, that are created along the way, that really change the way we do things. It's the investment in intellectual capital that I am arguing for, but only to say, if you start with the premise that we have to use less energy, we're not going to get there.
On December 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.