Thank you.
Mr. Edwards, in response to your last comment that this type of liability arrangement would lead to sloppiness in design, I kind of think that the nuclear scientists who design these projects are professionals. They're fully trained in what they do, and they would probably take offence to that. I don't fit in that category, so I'll leave that offence to them.
I want to get to a point that talks about the cost of the liability versus the cost of doing all of the things that you've suggested. In your studies, apart from determining that there are some serious safety factors, in your opinion, with the existing sites and the way we're building them now, have you taken all of your suggestions into consideration and arrived at the extra cost factor of putting all of your ideas into being? How would that relate to the electricity charge to the consumer?
After all, whether it's a liability insurance claim or it's doing all of the things that you suggest, there's only one person who's going to pay for it. It's going to be the user of electricity.
How do your ideas, in total, relate to electricity costs for the consumer?