Our interest was, in the event of a very serious accident, to rely very heavily on the tribunal to provide effective, efficient, and equitable compensation of victims. So we wanted to hold onto as much of the fund as possible for, actually, the claims determination by the tribunal. Nevertheless, we recognized it might take a bit of time for the tribunal to get up and running, so we wanted to have some mechanism to have money out to victims when the insurers are no longer operating. So that's why we limited it to 20%.
On December 6th, 2007. See this statement in context.