Well, it's of all governments, if you were speaking specifically of the federal government.
I go back to a principle of what we were about and what we came to be about. It is that it requires a paradigm shift in the policy, in the way we view energy produced in this nation. We tend to look at the residential or the built environment as a consumer-only issue: how to reduce the consumption.
If we change the mindset and don't just look to the central generation sources—nuclear, hydro, coal, to speak of where we are right now—as the only option, and if we look to the built environment as part of the solution on a production level, I think the federal government has a role to play there, with a national energy vision or strategy. I don't want to use the term “national energy policy”, because that's a bad term, but a “national energy strategy” of some kind that gives opportunity to these varied options of energy production. We lack that in the country.
If we could find one, potentially the energy sources—whether for transportation, or electrical sources of energy for the home, or thermal energy sources.... We need a strategy that identifies how we can find those strengths and leverage them. We don't do that right now by identifying the built environment. Until we do it, we're going to continue making programs or initiatives in silos and never effectively take an integrated approach to how we're going to produce energy in this country.