Thanks very much.
Thank you for your excellent testimony and your obvious frustration, if not outrage, on behalf of your patients. We thank you for your frankness and your advocacy for the patients of Canada.
If we look first to nuclear medicine and to the working group that reported in May 2008, you had four points there--ensuring efficient and effective communication with the medical community and the public, and three others. But at the same time, you said that it was exactly the same time that MAPLE 1 and MAPLE 2 shut down. Obviously, an ad hoc committee is an ad hoc committee.
What has happened in terms of coordination of both the alternatives in patient care and securing a supply since the time of the tabling of the expert committee report of May 2008 at the same time as MAPLE 1 and MAPLE 2 were decommissioned?