One thing bothers me. When the Chalk River reactor shut down in May of this year, it wasn't the first time that had occurred. You're also telling us you want to extend the useful life of that reactor until 2016. Was the government able to anticipate the shutdown of that reactor when it happened the first time? Is it really worth the trouble to extend the useful life of that reactor? Between now and 2016, will there be another extended outage that will cause a crisis and as a result of which I'll be here, white-haired, asking you the same questions?
On August 21st, 2009. See this statement in context.