Some people like the word “subsidy” because it attracts a lot of attention. I think it's good business sense from shareholders in the electricity business to underwrite their own obligations to be safe and secure for their populations. I see nothing wrong with that. I don't see it as a subsidy. The issue clearly is driving those entities to not only be safe and secure but also to operate their utilities in a way that provides their beneficiaries with very sound and competitive electricity rates.
So the decision is not about subsidization. The decision by those shareholders is all about making their jurisdictions very competitive in a very tough world of doing business.