Yes. Actually, I think moving it from $75 million, as it is now, to $650 million is seen as a very big uptake in the values against accidents.
I think the industry itself works overtime to ensure that we have a safe operation, and as Ms. McClenaghan identified, we have been safe. We haven't had those types of accidents in the more than 40 years that we've had commercial reactors generating electricity in Canada, but as an industry, we recognize that we must upgrade the limit from $75 million, which we see as being too small, to the $650 million limit, which I think is within the range of world coverages. In effect, we are agreeing to this movement because we recognize that we have to modernize.
Having said that, I note that it puts us into the other part of my presentation, which said that if we go to these higher levels, then we must be permitted to have competitive opportunities to shop for that liability coverage to ensure that we are getting the best possible value for our coverage. That, Mr. Regan, looking at moving from $75 million to $650 million, presents its own issues.
We think this is a valid and reasonable increase in coverage that moves us into a range that is acceptable around the world.