I think Mr. Stensil was talking about 2004. At the preliminary stage of any legislative review, I think it's not uncommon to have to start with somebody, but obviously the difference in this situation is that we're in front of this parliamentary committee for the second time now with a piece of legislation that really has attracted the attention of a good part of the public.
In fact, I took a quick peek at the list of some of the presenters the last time. An item from 2004, which I think would attract some attention, is not bad theatre, but when the reality of our current circumstance is that the government has been down this track, through this parliamentary committee, in fact with some of the same members, although not exclusively the same members, a concern about not consulting the public broadly would be about notification. Notification has occurred in this situation, not once but twice now. I think we all have been prepared.
I think the presentations here should lay to rest any concern that the public was somehow kept out of being aware of any changes.