So again, this issue is interwoven into the things that are going on with the nuclear industry right now--the potential sale; the issue of isotopes; and clearly, the issue of insurance, what insurance exposure folks are going to have.
What I'm confused by is that private industry seems so comfortable with the idea that taxpayers have to be on the hook for anything above $650 million in claims. I don't know why we can't call that a subsidy. You, as a company, also generate power from other sources. I assume the U.S. and Canadian governments don't provide a cap and a limit on the insurance claims that might happen if a wind tower were to be knocked over. Why would they do it for nuclear?