Not to my knowledge. As I mentioned, in this industry it began in the 1950s, when the American vendors started looking to export overseas and they were worried about being sued in other jurisdictions. That's when these liability regimes started to be imposed in other countries, because the suppliers who provide these reactors don't have confidence that their reactors won't undergo accidents. That's why we have this legislation.
I think one of the reasons we're starting to hear discussion about the Convention on Supplementary Compensation by the industry representatives today is that perhaps for the first time Canada is looking at buying reactors from other jurisdictions, suppliers such as Westinghouse; Areva, from France; and the Japanese. I think there may be a fear by vendors, if they were to build in Canada, that they may be open to litigation without a cap in the United States.