If there is no tribunal and if we're just going to an ordinary court to resolve disputes, which might happen, then it's true; it's first come, first served. Therefore, if the first guy who showed up was somebody who had a claim for economic loss because of an electricity outage, then it's true that the $650 million could perhaps--perhaps--get taken up. This ensures that in that event, the money is preserved for people who are more directly affected. Of course we will see later, when we get to other provisions of the bill, that there are ways the tribunal can manage such a situation, but that's later.
On November 25th, 2009. See this statement in context.