When reflecting on subclause 16(2)? No. It was more in relation to reducing those damages that would be indirect as opposed to more direct, because this is a limited scheme of liability for the operator. And that was a consideration.
November 25th, 2009 / 4:55 p.m.
Director, Uranium and Radioactive Waste Division, Electricity Resources Branch, Department of Natural Resources
When reflecting on subclause 16(2)? No. It was more in relation to reducing those damages that would be indirect as opposed to more direct, because this is a limited scheme of liability for the operator. And that was a consideration.
See context to find out what was said next.