Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
On the question of subclause 16(2), I want to compare the situations that would exist, and I think this is what Mr. Cullen was doing.
I want to compare the situation that would exist with this provision--this act in law and this provision in law--to the situation in tort law at the moment with other power providers, such as a coal plant that shuts down by accident. I know there are cases in which the courts will find that the damage suffered by someone as an indirect consequence of something is too remote to be compensated. How would a situation that exists now in tort law if a coal plant or a hydroelectric plant shut down because of negligence compare to what would exist under this provision?