Right. What I want to understand, and this is perhaps my point.... If a nuclear power plant is unable for whatever reasons to provide power, if something goes wrong, if they shut down--we've had this experience in Canada before where a refurbishment takes too long or they go into an early shutdown or whatever happens--damages can be sought now under the contract they have with the power provider. I'm not talking about accidents. I'm talking about just something normal. If the provider were to call it a nuclear incident instead of just something going offline, do they not avoid potential damages? I want to make sure this doesn't create a loophole for the nuclear industry to say, well, you can't come back on us in the contract that we have with you because what happened last Saturday wasn't a mistake. It's what we are going to call a nuclear incident.
On November 25th, 2009. See this statement in context.