There would be no compensation at all. So oftentimes, and again I'm trying to get back to the notion of negligence....
The cascading power loss that started in the U.S.--I'm trying to remember the year. Was it 2004? It came across the border and we lost quite a bit. In that case, because there was a point of proven negligence south of the border--I don't think Canadians got in on the action at all--they sought compensation and were awarded compensation for negligence that was proved on the part of the provider of electricity. They said, you were negligent, and because of that power loss I lost all the food in my restaurant's fridge and my business had to go out of business for two days.
Under this law that would not be allowed--even in the case of a proven point of negligence, because this doesn't exist under any kind of tort law.