The parliamentary process is a wondrous thing.
The question I have we referenced earlier. At first, folks weren't entirely certain. We got into the notion of workers at the site. I think this was back in clause 15. We weren't sure about collective agreements. That was put aside. I don't know if you have any further research on that. We also found that the nuclear operator itself—I think you have clarified it again in clause 18—can't be compensated for anything they were doing to the site itself, so if an order is issued and there is an accident, for damages that are repaired or shored up, the nuclear operator can't seek compensation under Bill C-20. That would be counterintuitive.
For the workers working at the plant who are also ordered out, under one of these instances--I imagine it wouldn't be a day necessarily, it could be quite a long time--are they able to seek compensation? For instance, their neighbours are evacuated, and these folks are also evacuated but are also out of work. Under clause 18, is this a place for that authority...? I think you actually referenced clause 18 a bit when we were talking about clause 15, and you said there was something further down the line in terms of whether an authority had issued an accident.
Could you help me out?