I think he's suggesting we have two meetings on this hearing. The main focus seems to be the Beaufort, but that's not particularly what the motion says. So if we're going to agree to focus on the north and what's happening there, we can do that. I think we can cover it in a couple of meetings. If we want to talk about the regulatory regime in Canada and the emergency response assets to offshore drilling in general--Nathan mentioned offshore drilling across Canada--and do it in two meetings, we're going to have some short, quick testimony.
We're willing to do this, but what is the focus specifically? Do we want to just focus on the Beaufort? I think we can decide that in the next five minutes. Do we want to focus on offshore drilling across Canada? As Geoff pointed out, we have different regulatory regimes and supervisory organizations across the country. So if it's just the Beaufort I think we can do that in a couple of meetings, but we need to get our lists in first. If it's wider than that and we want to spend a couple of extra meetings on it, we can decide to do that as well. We'd just like to know what we're doing.