Okay. So on my question with the respect to the ban, the ban is targeted in a particular area on our north coast. But what it's banning is entrance in and out of our coast, when at the very same time—and this is where the irony is—we have tankers transiting from Alaska down to Cherry Point, Washington, and Long Beach, along our coast, with freedom of passage through what is called innocent passage. It seems to me that what we're doing is preventing transit from our coast, yet we're allowing it along our coast alongside these areas where the tanker ban is instigated. So it's a curious--
On December 9th, 2010. See this statement in context.