I get from your answer that your company would be opposed to the manner in which it's done and if it's properly engaging with industry and the stakeholders, provinces and other groups.
Mr. Guilbeault, a question to you. This committee is studying energy security, which doesn't have necessarily a unified or consensus definition but has something to do with affordable, sustainable, and reliable sources of energy for a country. Some would argue that the tar sands, the oil sands--whatever term we are going to use here today--are an important part of Canada's energy security. They are a large source of hydrocarbon energy and are critical to Canada's future, both economically and as a position, as the Prime Minister has called it, as the energy superpower.
Is there anything contrary in that statement, or is that just something that groups like yours have come to accept or must accept as their current reality?