Let me comment on that. I believe this is in reference to the INES scale, which is essentially drawn up by the IEA to assess and evaluate events in terms of their significance.
If you look at the Canadian industry and its performance, it's exemplary in this manner. As has been pointed out, there have been a number of significant events, but there's a very large culture of reporting in our industry, and there's been very little in the way of significant impact on publics.
Clearly, there have been events; no one would ever say that there aren't events. I would tell you one thing about the nuclear industry; it's that we learn from each other. We recognize that we're hostages of each other, and we learn from each other. What is happening around the lessons learned from Japan is no different from other cases.
By the way, that event in 2003 created a lot of learning for us in the industry. Chernobyl essentially built some of the operator industry groups that you see today.
No one says that incidents don't occur. They're rare. When they impact upon on the public, they're even rarer. The safety performance industry has been solid. Certainly the Canadian industry has been a solid performer.