Number one would be immigration that's a little more responsive to the knowledge worker or the needs of knowledge industries. We've had our struggles in that respect.
Number two, which is already being done and which we're grateful for, would be that the trade missions or the overseas efforts by DFAIT and others are of immeasurable value to companies, especially small ones that don't have the billions of dollars behind them to go out and spread their message to customers around the world.
Number three would be tightening up the environmental regulations. There's a signal or a market and pricing consequence one way or another, depending on whether you make it easier or harder to put carbon into the atmosphere. You don't have to get into cap and trade or taxes or anything like that with some sensible signals to the marketplace, the domestic marketplace. You end up motivating local players and encouraging alternatives.
The last one might be a money savings issue, although I don't have the data or know the specifics, so I'm giving you some money here. The IEA reports that globally—I don't know Canada's portion—the direct and indirect subsidies on the hydrocarbon side are at somewhere over $500 billion per year. If there's any amount of that that doesn't make sense anymore, then maybe taking a look at carving back on those things would be of some use in this respect, not only for the renewable sector, but also directly, I think, incenting more of the Laricina kinds of success stories that are out there.