This may be an interesting one for you. Norway has one LNG facility. It's way up there, close to the Barents Sea in the Arctic. That was developed mainly for the American market. Statoil built a part of an ...energy terminal to be able to get it into the U.S.
Today, we have shipped several LNG boats all the way to the Asian market. You are a lot closer to Asia than we are. The question in my mind for you is that you should look at your gas resources and [Inaudible--Editor] that toward the need for heating in the tar sands. Oil is more valuable than gas in the international market, even the bitumen. Upgraded, it improves. Refined, it improves a lot. You need gas to be able to do that. It's a question of going back to the old policies from the 1970s of the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board when the tar sands were able to buy gas cheaply so that they could produce all at the Syncrude plant. In 1974, that operation was not profitable. It was only the low Canadian gas price that made it happen.
You shouldn't go back to that, but you need to take a look at the overall Canadian energy situation, the energy situation of all the provinces—Alberta, Saskatchewan, British Columbia, etc.—and balance it for the Canadian voter...mostly U.S. companies, or for that matter all the foreign companies like Statoil.