Norway is a totally different situation. I mean, the one thing Canada has going for it, which should never be underestimated, is that most places in the world have this curious idea that hydrocarbon assets should belong to the state. I'm not talking about Saudi Arabia or Venezuela; I'm talking about Mexico and Norway. Canada and the United States are exceptions to that rule.
If you look at the development of oil production in the Orinoco versus the tar sands, I think that goes a long way in explaining why Canadian development has been so much more rapid. Whether we'll continue to accept this model remains to be seen, but I think people in North America forget just how unique the North American regulatory system is.
If you were to talk to Shell or Exxon.... I mean, Exxon was expropriated in the Orinoco. In most places in the world, to gain access to a hydrocarbon resource you have to partner with a state oil company on very unequal terms.