Yes. We're very concerned about the bottlenecking that's going on right now. It's not just in Alberta, but that seems to have been the hot topic for the last four or five years. We have to move some product. If we don't get some product moving very soon....
We've already lost the Suncor Voyageur project. That project has been restarted three times. It's a massive mining project. I think it's 600,000 barrels a day. It has now been shelved again. Kearl Lake, too, is now shelved. ConocoPhillips is pulling back on a project.
I'd like to make a point here. Maybe it's away from your question, but if I could, I'd like to make a point. We do a lot of maintenance in northern Alberta, with six-week, eight-week, and 10-week shutdowns. The timing on them is critical. We hit them with huge amounts of men and we work for 10 weeks. It's okay for a journeyman to pick up three of those a year; he can make a living. I need capital projects for apprenticeship. I can't expect apprentices to go to work for six weeks, then be off for three months, and then go back for six weeks. That's not an apprenticeship.
We need capital projects. We need Kearl Lake too. We need Voyageur. We need ConocoPhillips. We need Syncrude to go ahead with their major expansion. If we can't get some of this oil out of Alberta, they're not going to go ahead. I'm sorry, but that's just the way it's going to be.
My perfect world is Keystone XL first. It's the closest one that we could export oil with. The next one would be west-east to help out our friends in Sarnia, Montreal, Quebec, and especially New Brunswick, who dying for help. After that, we could work on getting Gateway and Kinder Morgan online.