Absolutely, and that multiplier is not just revenue to companies, but lost government revenue as well, in the order of about $8 billion every year that could otherwise go to higher education, health care, tax reduction, or whatever you would choose to deploy.
I want to restate something that I mentioned in an earlier response as well. We are decidedly agnostic about the use of that tube of steel a metre under the ground. Our job is to build it with state-of-the-art technologies and keep it as safe as possible for decades to come.
As for Canada's future energy needs and choices with respect to upgrading or what is moving, we can adapt to that, as we have done and as we will continue to do in the decades forward, whether it's natural gas, refined products, diluted bitumen, or—who knows?—maybe future products that we've not yet seen.