Just for clarification, would not adding this clause that it includes any physical activity that is incidental to the physical activity described in paragraphs (a) to (d) not take on item (e) in the sense of the drafting? Do we need to explicitly state that?
I think Linda's question is this. Is this sentence actually added on to the end of the paragraph itemized (d), or is it proposing a new paragraph, item (e), which would make more sense to me, which would be implied in the legislative process? Or is it a sentence that's actually hung at the end that belongs in the preamble or the start of proposed subsection (2), which I believe would also make the same amount of sense if we were to re-word it in the definition of what a physical activity includes, because it's trying to define the physical activity as any physical activity that's incidental as well to those physical activities outlined in items (a) through (d).
By putting (e) on it, I think actually captures the spirit or intent. Would it not?