Sure. I will take the second part first. They are two distinct aspects in the sense that in the second, the land claims, we're providing technical advice on forestry or land surveys, etc. So it is technical advice into a bigger process. But you're right, obviously there is some commonality between the two. But I do think it's fair to say they are separate even beyond the purposes of the supplementary estimates (B).
It is hard to answer the hypothetical question on future increases. At the moment there is no plan to augment this activity. As we go through it we may uncover some things that we'd like to do more of and spend more money on, and at that point we'll have a decision to make as to whether we do that extra activity and take away from something else we're doing within the department or somewhere else in government, or whether we come back and try to access additional funds.
The only small caveat I'd put on that is that part of the effort we're looking at in the cumulative impacts is monitoring. This is an area where I think there really is an opportunity for us to do a better job of monitoring and to engage first nations more actively in that monitoring effort. Depending upon how that goes, it is a potential area where we could want to spend a bit more money. But again at that point we have to weigh off: do we ask for more or do we take it from something else that we're doing?
Otherwise, there are no plans at the moment for increased expenditures.