Sure.
There are two questions there. I think you're right to point out both B.C. and Alberta. I've tended, at least in my remarks, to focus on B.C., but the initiative covers both B.C. and Alberta. I guess it's just a reflection of the activity there that in using examples I've tended to point to just B.C. That's a fair point on the first question.
On the second, we have seen an increase in activity in shipping by rail, for a variety of reasons. Indeed, the U.S. representatives were here providing some information on their quadrennial energy review. Just in looking at the amount of rail shipments and how they've increased over time, it's a map that is quite different from what you would have had five years ago, say, in terms of what you see now for the number of shipments. It's of interest, and that has been helped by some changes in rail safety initiatives that the government has put forward.
I'm not aware of the NEB comment you made, nor at this time can I comment on whether there's any government initiative or intention to change the NEB's mandate. There are none that I'm aware of, and I wouldn't comment on that, but I would just support your point that we are seeing an increase in activity on this front, and it's something that we're paying attention to.