I think the limit, to this extent, has been set largely by some worst-case considerations that we have seen. I think one of the other panellists spoke to the total costs related to...call it a “worst-case situation” that transpired with one of our member companies. I think it has exceeded the billion dollar mark at this point.
As I indicated in my own comments, I think there is a cost to be borne by these companies in ensuring access to these funds. In no way, as I have indicated, is there any desire to limit their response requirements.
However, I think it's incumbent upon good government to ensure the costs that are induced by a risk-based approach to this, as I said earlier with respect to likelihood versus consequence, are considered as you seek to determine what the proper numbers should be.