Evidence of meeting #110 for Natural Resources in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was fire.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Tracey Cooke  Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre
David Nisbet  Partnership and Science Manager, Invasive Species Centre
Kent Hehr  Calgary Centre, Lib.
Darlene Upton  Vice-President, Protected Areas Establishment and Conservation, Parks Canada Agency
Gilles Seutin  Chief Ecosystem Scientist, Protected Areas Establishment and Conservation Directorate, Parks Canada Agency

11:10 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal James Maloney

Good morning, everybody. Thank you for joining us today for our continued study on forest pests.

We're joined this morning by two witnesses from the Invasive Species Centre, Tracey Cooke and David Nisbet.

Thank you very much for coming.

Tracey Cooke is the executive director and David is the partnership and science manager.

The process for the meeting is that once everybody stops talking and starts listening, you will be given up to 10 minutes to do a presentation, which you can do in French and/or English. You'll be asked questions possibly in either or both official languages, so there are translation devices there should you need them. Then after your presentation, we're going to go around the table and you'll be asked questions from different committee members.

The floor is yours.

I understand, Ms. Cooke, you're going to lead us into the discussion.

11:10 a.m.

Tracey Cooke Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Yes. Thank you very much, Chair, and good morning.

I would like to thank the honourable members of the committee for inviting the Invasive Species Centre here to speak today.

In 2011, the not-for-profit Invasive Species Centre, or ISC, was formed through a collaborative memorandum of understanding as a strategic initiative of the Canadian Forest Service, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, as a unique example of partnership and a Canadian hub for collaboration and knowledge sharing.

Our mission is to connect stakeholders, knowledge and technology to prevent and reduce the spread of invasive species in Canada. We are a bridging organization between research and research end-users, bringing knowledge to action. In the last two years alone, we have made over 170 policy impacts by risk assessments and best management practices; welcomed 10,000 people to consultations, training, and presentations; and have had a very strong digital presence.

As you know, insects are one of the most important disturbance agents in Canada's forests, and many of the worst are considered to be invasive.

A species is invasive if it is introduced outside of its native range and has potential negative impacts on ecology, economy or society in its introduced range. Invasive species introductions are regarded as the second greatest threat to global biodiversity, next to habitat loss. Forest pests are significant because of their dynamic nature and the substantial value of forest ecosystems to our environment, economy and society.

The introduction of an invasive forest pest can cause a decline in the biodiversity and health of a forest ecosystem but also a large reduction in wood fibre. This loss of trees can reduce habitat for native animals and insects, create canopy gaps altering the microclimate of the forest, and make that forest even more vulnerable to additional invasive species, overall reducing biodiversity. One of the greatest direct economic impacts of forest pest outbreaks is felt by the forestry sector through reduced wood supply or wood quality. This can significantly lower revenues for forest companies, impacting the economic strength of this sector, one of Canada's most important manufacturing sectors.

In many cases, outbreaks start in urban settings. The spread of invasive species is heavily influenced by human activity, following common shipping and trade routes. In urban settings, individual trees are valued for environmental and economic services and for their social and health benefits. TD Economics valued the trees in Toronto's urban forest alone at $7 billion, and that's about $700 per tree, and they calculated that they provide Torontonians with 80 million dollars' worth of environmental benefits and cost savings per year.

From 2016 to 2018, we at the Invasive Species Centre surveyed Ontario municipalities to assess their annual direct expenditures on invasive species management. Analysis and projection on this data indicates that Ontario municipalities alone are collectively spending $36.4 million per year, or an average of $380,000 per year per municipality. This is considered to be a conservative estimate and is focused on Ontario for the purpose of this study. Full impacts and expenditures would be much greater for Canada.

Since 2011, when the federal and provincial governments established the ISC, we have been working collaboratively with federal and provincial governments in improving invasive species outcomes in Canada, particularly with addressing gaps and reducing overlap. Along with our partners, we have shared and supported government objectives on forest pests and would like to highlight the following.

We've provided leadership and support to improve collaboration at the regional, species and pathways levels. We've conducted research on the firewood movement pathway in particular, for the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers' forest pest working group. We've conducted training for practitioners on hemlock woolly adelgid and oak wilt identification and preventative practices, two species that are of great concern to Canada, including hosting workshops, developing fact sheets, participating on advisory committees and engaging citizen scientists.

We contribute to policy solutions such as best management practices for firewood movement in partnership with the Canadian Council on Invasive Species. We have developed a “made in Ontario” risk assessment and early detection rapid response plan for mountain pine beetle that incorporates knowledge and experience from western Canada within the context of Ontario's forests.

We've brought detailed recommendations that came out of that risk assessment. My colleague David can highlight these in more detail as a case study during the question period, if you would like more information.

Ecological and socio-economic risk assessment research has been completed on forest pest species to support regulation under Ontario's Invasive Species Act. We've also improved response capacity and increased the state of the knowledge. We've developed a website, forestinvasives.ca, which is an online hub for information on invasive pests that threaten Canada's forests.

We've developed social media posts to stimulate discussion and get quick dissemination of information and pest alerts to the public. We've created a citizen science program—the Early Detection and Rapid Response Network Ontario—to engage community members to learn and respond to invasive species detection. We are very close to publishing an emerald ash borer manual for land managers in partnership with Natural Resources Canada. This will be a step-by-step guide from pre-invasion to post-invasion for municipalities, first nations and other land managers.

We've created an online database of invasive species risk assessments, which is the first multi-taxa, searchable public database of its kind in Canada. We provide insect diagnostic services for the Province of Ontario, and we verify findings to report to authorities. We've also worked with CFIA to integrate regulated area data into public interfaces, as well as targeted outreach on forest pests in high-risk areas, including the most recent Winnipeg emerald ash borer detection.

These successes can be attributed to intensive collaboration from a number of groups. Accomplishments have been considerable, but we still have significant work to do. Most species invasions follow a similar pattern, commonly referred to as the invasion curve, which compares time to area occupied, beginning from the first occurrence of a species in a new area. As time goes on, the invasive species spreads further into the environment, almost exponentially, until it becomes widely established on the landscape. If the species is detected early in the invasion curve—for example, a single infested tree—then it can be easily and quickly eradicated. However, if an invasive species becomes widespread and established at the landscape level, eradication is much less likely and very costly.

A 2009 report prepared for the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers concluded that Canada could have avoided a cost of $165 million annually by preventing the introduction and establishment of four high-profile invasive forest insects and diseases. The estimated average annual cost over the next 20 years is $34 million if just one additional invasive species were to become established in Canada. For every $1 spent on coordinated multi-jurisdictional prevention activities, $3 in mitigation, regulatory and depletion costs can be avoided if that pest is prevented from establishing.

With an expected increase in invasions and outbreaks in the future, we must focus on a state of preparedness. In terms of strategy, our recommended next steps include that the federal government, with the support of its partner network, scan the horizon and be proactive, preparing for future invasions rather than reacting to invasive species that are already present. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Future strategies and enhanced investments by the federal government should focus on the early stage of an invasion or outbreak, prevention and early detection. Early detection and a rapid sustained response to an invasive species are critical to reduce long-term economic, environmental and social impacts. A national fund that could be established by the federal government in collaboration with their provincial partners would mitigate costly delays and support response in an efficient way. The federal government could improve outcomes by increased investment and streamlining processes in existing partnerships and collaborative networks, both domestic and international.

The Invasive Species Centre was formed by government. It is well positioned as an organization rooted in science with the proven ability to facilitate collaboration and eliminate inefficiencies to implement these actions.

We look forward to working with all partners, both government and non-government, to address forest pest issues within Canada.

11:15 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal James Maloney

Thank you very much.

Mr. Harvey, you're going to start us off.

11:15 a.m.

Liberal

TJ Harvey Liberal Tobique—Mactaquac, NB

Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to our guests for being here with us today.

If you had to summarize, what would be the top five things the federal government could do to work in conjunction with private industry and NGOs to take a more proactive approach to how we deal with forest pests in rural and urban environments?

We need to take into account that the landscapes are different in both of those areas. I'm not sure whether we need to look at integrated pest management solutions or place a greater focus on biological controls versus traditional pesticide management. I'm interested in your thoughts.

11:20 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

Emergency response effectiveness is one of the top ways we could look at doing that, perhaps the development of a national framework that would engage all these partners and actually assign leads. We have done an exercise with emergency response, implementing the incident command system in an outbreak situation, having people assigned to be in charge of the incident, people assigned to reach out to partners, that type of thing, setting that framework in advance.

With that might be the establishment of an emergency response fund so that it can be a very rapid response, so that the funding is there to access and doesn't require a lot of steps for approval. We certainly have that model as well for the mountain pine beetle in the case of Ontario. Possibly conduct and support exercises, go through a mock exercise of some of these types of responses to the different species that might be on the horizon. Then look to provide new tools for end-users, the biological control or the chemical control, or whatever research can be done with the federal government to provide some of those tools. In some cases, I know you're already doing that, with the emerald ash borer and things such as that. Another aspect is to make sure that the information is widely disseminated to the partners and that the partners are involved, and perhaps provide a mechanism to share those experiences.

Then I mentioned getting ahead of the threats by scanning the horizon, taking a role in coordinating some national studies and analysis and using a risk pathway analysis model, as we did for the firewood pathway, where you focus on how those pests are getting in. That was something we've done for firewood, and it can be done for other pathways. Perhaps you could look at allowing coordination of an information and data-sharing network so that everyone has access to the same information, and continuing to fund research and possibly partnering with organizations such as us to make sure that we can bridge that research to go out to the people who it needs to go out to.

The third thing would be to possibly engage with and fund provinces, industry and non-government associations to address the leading edge of the invasion, possibly a fund that could have other contributors as well. Industry might want to contribute, and there might be other organizations as well. Assess those high-risk stands near borders, using silvicultural practices to treat those high-risk stands and prepare in advance for that leading edge of the invasion, and adjust harvest accordingly there. In order to train those “eyes on the ground”, look at citizens science networks, keeping in mind that the provinces and the federal government don't have all the on-the-ground staff that we might need to help with early detection. Have the citizen scientists or the other groups on the ground and make sure they're well trained.

Communication is also a big piece. That's something we're very strong at, but just enable Canadians to help reduce the risk of spreading invasive species by high-risk pathways, human pathways such as carrying firewood. Ingrain positive behaviour into the societal norm.

11:20 a.m.

Liberal

TJ Harvey Liberal Tobique—Mactaquac, NB

Okay.

In your work, would you say that CFS has been a positive partner to engage with in times of crisis?

I know some of the other people we've heard from have talked about their collaborative relationship with CFS and how that has worked for them. Could you speak a little on how you feel CFS could play a role in facilitating the government side of the bridge between the NGOs and provincial governments and the federal response as well?

11:25 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

We've had a very positive relationship as well with the Canadian Forest Service. They helped form the ISC. They saw the need for an organization such as that seven years ago when we were started.

The CFS could definitely play a coordination role in having a collaborative partner or agreements with partners, maybe multiple partners in some cases to be able to coordinate some of this work. I don't think they need to do it all on their own. They certainly could engage the partners that we have. If there was a mechanism to make those partnership agreements a little easier to facilitate, that would be very helpful, maybe multi-year agreements so that there isn't perhaps some of the paperwork involved that goes along with some of the agreements to be able to help facilitate that.

Certainly they're very strong at the research. Where we don't do the actual research at our facility, we can take that research and get that science and information out to the practitioners.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

TJ Harvey Liberal Tobique—Mactaquac, NB

Do you think that regional flexibility and program development and implementation need to be integral to the pathway going forward to ensure that the solutions both proactively and reactively address different geographic needs and the needs of different species, as well as rural versus urban?

11:25 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

Yes. We definitely need to take that into account. Even when you're dealing with a species such as the mountain pine beetle that's native to western Canada, it could be devastating and very impactful to eastern Canada. You definitely have to take those regional pieces into consideration.

Then you have to consider the pathway perspective too. We have the oceans coming from that pathway perspective, the shipping, and then you have the Great Lakes, so there are lots of different pathways that species can come in through. I think you definitely have to have some overall national coordination for that piece, but it has to take regional particulars into consideration for sure.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

TJ Harvey Liberal Tobique—Mactaquac, NB

Thank you very much.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal James Maloney

Excellent. Thank you.

Mr. Calkins, I understand you're next.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Red Deer—Lacombe, AB

Yes, I am. Thank you, Chair.

This is my first time back at the natural resources committee since the previous election. I'm glad to be back.

I have some questions for you. Thank you for the presentation.

I think you spoke about it when you talked about the 3:1 ratio, where an ounce of prevention is worth actually three ounces of cure. You talked about potential upcoming threats and that every new threat is going to cost approximately $40 million to $50 million to deal with based on previous experiences with past threats that have gotten out of control.

What's the next threat? What's on the horizon? Do you have a list of potential threats that we should be aware of?

11:25 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

It is definitely regionally specific, but some of the ones that we've been working on specifically are the hemlock woolly adelgid, which is already in parts of Canada.

11:25 a.m.

David Nisbet Partnership and Science Manager, Invasive Species Centre

It's been detected in parts around the Niagara Gorge and then eradicated by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. There have been detections, and it's established in Nova Scotia. In Ontario, it's been detected twice and quickly eradicated.

11:25 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

Oak wilt is a pathogen that is on our radar, which is very close to Canada but has not quite been identified yet.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Red Deer—Lacombe, AB

It's not here yet.

11:25 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

But it could be very devastating as well, given the significant number of oak trees that are in our urban forest settings.

Obviously the mountain pine beetle is of concern to Ontario and other provinces in the east.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Red Deer—Lacombe, AB

Welcome to the club.

11:25 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

Yes.

The emerald ash borer, for parts of Canada that don't yet have it, could be of significant concern as it continues to spread.

Can you think of something else?

11:25 a.m.

Partnership and Science Manager, Invasive Species Centre

David Nisbet

The Asian long-horned beetle would be another one.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Red Deer—Lacombe, AB

Some of these are invasive species that can survive here long enough to do damage.

Are they true invasive species or are they just at the edge of a geographic range that's expanding now due to changes in weather patterns, weather cycles or climate cycles?

11:30 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

It's a combination of both. The emerald ash borer and the Asian long-horned beetle are not native to Canada, so they have arrived here via different pathways and obviously have the ability to adapt and survive.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Red Deer—Lacombe, AB

You're not distinguishing between natural ranges changing and an invasive species that has actually been introduced. You're just identifying it based on what the current status quo is and trying to maintain that homeostatic balance of what we have currently in Canada. Is that right?

11:30 a.m.

Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre

Tracey Cooke

Yes, if it meets our definition of “invasive”.... It may be a native pest that is introduced into a new range and therefore has a great impact. That's considered invasive.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Red Deer—Lacombe, AB

When a new species, an invasive species, a native species that's outside of its range, or when your definition of an “invasive species” is detected, what happens?

I know what happens when a forest fire is set up. There's a command post set up. Somebody's in charge right away and all resources are brought to bear that can be brought to bear. Is it a similar type of thing?

How do you respond if it happens to be in a national park, a provincial park, in a Crown land area, or on private land? What are the problems and differences in being able to respond to that?