Thank you for that question.
There are two elements I might highlight. One is with respect to any specific adjudication process, which is just a portion of our work. As a regulator, we undertake a number of regulatory activities throughout the life cycle of a project but specifically in an adjudication context, in a hearing, working with participants, we want to ensure that the issues that all participants have are raised and addressed and adjudicated in the context of a formal review—specifically indigenous communities and the constitutional rights associated with working with indigenous communities, including consultation. Our considerations around consultation are critical and do drive an approach that ensures we are quite deliberate in the context of working with communities and respecting rights, ensuring that we have that reconciliation lens in mind and that we are guided by the policy framework of the Government of Canada in that regard.
I'll also mention that our approach to engaging with both indigenous communities and non-indigenous communities throughout our entire life cycle oversight is guided by those same principles, so very much driven in the case of indigenous communities with a reconciliation lens in mind, very much driven by a commitment to engaging in meaningful relationships. That would be true with other stakeholders, but it has a context specifically in terms of indigenous engagement, and I say that for us it's very much guiding our approach on our entire core responsibility. You'll see that in our performance reporting and certainly our strategic planning.