I understand what you're saying about cabinet making a political decision, but because these five principles are very broad and ambiguous, even as far as the GHG upstream emissions and the control that these proponents have are concerned, and they don't know what the cabinet will be looking at, can you recognize you have now changed it and taken it out of the NEB's hands? Under our government they made a recommendation on northern gateway. We approved it based on those recommendations.
But if you would even tell proponents that you will accept the NEB recommendations that will give them some certainty. Can you understand the uncertainty that is being caused because of the ambiguity and the political nature of the decision?