If I may start, regulatory certainty, I think, also extends to not just one project when reviewed, but to ensuring the people who are supposed to be participating in the review participate in the review.
I can't underscore how significant this piece of legislation, the Species at Risk Act, is to the mining sector when you have things like woodland caribou that have wide ranges, and the impact of its designation on projects. We have one project that was shelved, and not because we have low woodland caribou populations in Saskatchewan; it's because Environment Canada, in the species at risk portfolio, would not provide any certainty in the assessment review. So there's a lot of regulatory uncertainty.
In terms of the exploration tax credit, for junior companies it's very significant in Saskatchewan. As I mentioned, we've had at least one mine go into production that was largely funded through flow-through shares. A number of exploration properties that continue to develop—those are all junior companies—have had a very difficult time raising capital, so the flow-through shares have certainly been instrumental in helping them keep exploration going. Year by year is better than nothing, but certainly longer term would be good. And I think we know it's successful because Australia has copied Canada in terms of implementing this. It is a successful strategy, and a great return on investment.