Thank you for the question.
First, I think it's important to note that CNSC is an independent regulator that reports to Parliament through the Minister of Natural Resources and, in that respect, has independence from our department. I think the key for us in our support of the minister is ensuring that he's well supported with information as to the CNSC's activities.
I can certainly comment specifically on the two elements in question that you raise, both the anonymous letter and the recent CNSC audit. As you'll be aware, the CNSC did conduct an internal review of the claims raised in the anonymous letter and found that the claims were unfounded. The CNSC released that report for review and held a public meeting to review those findings. CNSC commissioners have confirmed that they're satisfied with the results of that review.
The CESD reviewed the CNSC as well and did find that it had improved upon its record-keeping and documentation practices with respect to site inspections. The CNSC has accepted those recommendations and is taking corrective action to address this. That includes ensuring that criteria for certain types of inspections are formalized and integrated into its management systems and improving staff awareness of procedures for site inspections and administration.
Three of the five concerns that the CESD raised have already been addressed. As evidenced before, the government does place the highest priority on safety and security in nuclear activities. The CNSC is recognized as among the best regulators in the world. It's subject to regular international peer review of its practices and has been found to be one of the best.
I will conclude by saying that the minister has clearly expressed publicly his confidence in the CNSC as an independent regulator, and I think that is the starting point we work from.