First of all, we committed to the SON that we would not proceed without their concurrence, so they effectively have a veto on the DGR facility. Discussions with the SON are proceeding very well, I would say. They have a very good perspective on nuclear power within their territory and the need to responsibly manage waste. In that vein, I think the dialogue is very good. We'll take the necessary time to reach that consensus. I am hopeful that we will get that consensus. Notwithstanding that, they absolutely have a veto. We committed to them that ultimately they have a veto on DGR proceeding.
As for a plan B, we don't have a well-developed plan B. If that were to come to pass, we would have to site and study an alternate location. That's really what it would come down to.